Gold.com, Inc.

Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant Dismissal of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm On September 14, 2026, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) of Gold.com, Inc. (the “Company”) dismissed Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) as the Company’s independent registered accounting firm, effective as of that date. The reports of Grant Thornton on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2026 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2026 and the subsequent interim period through September 14, 2026, there have been no disagreements with Grant Thornton on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Grant Thornton, would have caused Grant Thornton to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports. In accordance with Item 304(a)(3) of Regulation S-K, the Company provided Grant Thornton with a copy of this Current Report on Form 8-K prior to its filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) and requested that Grant Thornton furnish it with a letter addressed to the Commission stating whether it agrees with the above statements in this Item 4.01(a). A copy of Grant Thornton’s letter, dated September 18, 2026, is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. Engagement of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm On September 14, 2026, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2027. During the Company’s fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2026 and the subsequent interim period through September 14, 2026, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted KPMG regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided by KPMG to the Company that KPMG concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) or a “reportable event” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).